Send As SMS

Sunday, September 24, 2006

Why did Gaddafi come clean after all those years?

Independent Online Edition > Business News:

"US private equity giant Carlyle is in talks to acquire Libya's state-controlled oil refining and marketing operation, Tamoil.

Al-Saadi Gaddafi, the son of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, the country's long-time leader, said Carlyle was one of four or five groups involved in an international tender to buy 100 per cent of Tamoil. It is thought the business will fetch close to €3bn (£2bn).

Mr Gaddafi added that the other candidates included groups from Poland, Hungary and the United Arab Emirates. In addition, he said the Italian energy group ERG might have 'increased their bid a little bit. So maybe they will come back.'

Neither ERG nor Carlyle would comment."

Mr. Gaddafi is a known terrorist. Wasn't it recently he paid his dues to the people he bombed? Wasn't there a cash settlement even? Funny, I wondered then what that was about. Why did Gaddafi come clean after all those years?

George Bush Sr was on the board with Carlyle Group. He was meeting with one of Bin Ladens brothers on 9/11/01 as the planes struck the towers. They were partners in Caryle Group, a major US defense contractor. So less then one year after Gaddafi makes amends and is forgiven on the world stage he is negotiating a deal to sell his countries oil firm to who else but the Caryle Group.

Does anyone else find that strange? Should the father of our sitting President be negotiating deals with admitted terrorists? Is there something wrong with them putting this much money in that mans hands after what he has admitted to doing. Is an apology enough to allow trust in a man who blows up airplanes?

These people are two faced pigs. They took our country to war to free the world from terrorists that blow up airplanes and at the same time are doing business with terrorists that blow up airplanes.

Seems terror pays for the Bush Regime.

Friday, September 15, 2006

Why the Bush Administration May Let a Terror Suspect Go Free

TIME.com: Why the Bush Administration May Let a Terror Suspect Go Free:
"The Bush Administration prefers to paint the War on Terror in stark terms of good and evil, but the reality is not all terror suspects are considered equal. That much was clear on the same day that the nation solemnly recalled the fifth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, when a federal magistrate recommended freeing a man being held on immigration charges who is also awaiting retrial in Venezuela for the bombing of a Cuban airliner 30 years ago that resulted in the death of all aboard, including the Cuban national fencing team.

Cuban militant Luis Posada Carriles has been fighting for his release since May 17, 2005, when Department of Homeland Security officials arrested him in Miami for entering the country without having a visa or passing through passport control at the border. But in a move that may come back to haunt the U.S. government Posada, despite his suspected terrorist past, was held on immigration violations, not terror-related charges."

Anyone want to know why the Bush Regime cannot let this man be tried for his crimes? Do you think they have somehting to hide? The answer lies in the same article. The Bush Regime can't send Posada to face his crimes because they know he will tall. He'll talk and George Bush Sr doesn't want that. It will open up a can of worms he sealed a long time ago and has no desire to face again.

"After his escape from the Venezuelan prison in 1985, he went to El Salvador, where he reunited with the CIA. He went to work assisting Oliver North in providing the Nicaraguan Contras with weapons and supplies. After his involvement in the Iran-Contra Affair, Posada worked as a spy for then Salvadoran President Jose Napoleon Duarte."

That's right this guy was working with Bush Sr and the CIA selling drugs for guns. Nuff said.

Bush 'playing chicken' with senators - Sep 15, 2006

CNN.com - Toobin: Bush 'playing chicken' with senators - Sep 15, 2006:
"So even if the president gets his proposal through, it is not at all clear that the court will approve it, especially given one provision we didn't discuss much ... secret evidence. And this is something that Sen. Lindsey Graham has focused on a lot. And he said, 'Look, there's no court in America, especially the Supreme Court, that is going to uphold executing somebody ... based on evidence he never saw.'"

Thats right assfuck. You can't sentence a man to death on secret evidence. It violates the basic tenets of our society. There is no government that can be trusted with the life of any man woman or child. They simply do not value life so much as to be trusted to keep secrets of any kind much less those that a life depends on.

The Bush Regime is looking for a way out of the shit they have done already and he's putting up a hard fight because he knows his ass is going down for war crimes and if he can't protect those under him then they will turn on him. You see this shit runs up the chain all the way to the top. If he can't cover the CIA boys that went out and did what he asked them to do then those charges run all the way up to him. He will be sentenenced based on his commands and their actions.

He is not fighting for the CIA but for his own ass. I hope the Senate kicks his balls down his throat. I hope they hang his ass on the White House lawn for the murder he promotes. Impeach George Bush Now and Save America.

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Iran 'aggressively seeking atom bomb' | | The Australian

Iran 'aggressively seeking atom bomb' | | The Australian:

"IRAN is 'aggressively' trying to build atomic bombs and the time has come for sanctions to back diplomacy aimed at reining in Tehran, the US told the UN nuclear watchdog's board of governors today.

'Given Iran's history of deception, lack of transparency, provocative behaviour and disregard for its international obligations, we must take further steps to persuade Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons ambitions,' US envoy Gregory Schulte said in a board debate.

'We are convinced that Iran is aggressively pursuing the technology, material and know-how to build nuclear weapons,' Mr Schulte told the International Atomic Energy Agency's 35 nation board of governors in Vienna.

'The time has come for the (UN) security council to back international diplomacy with international sanctions,' he said.

'Sanctions will not signal an end to diplomacy' aimed at getting Iran to stop enriching uranium in exchange for trade incentives, he said.

'Iran's leaders must understand that their choices have consequences and that their best choice remains the course of cooperation. The United States remains committed to a diplomatic solution. But the world cannot accept a nuclear-armed Iran.'

Iran said its uranium enrichment program is meant solely to generate electricity but years of IAEA investigations have been unable"

We'll be in Iran in less than one year. No doubt a new war will be the catalyst they need to win the 2008 election.

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

"The Rant" by Tom Degan: A Strong Case For Impeachment

"The Rant" by Tom Degan: A Strong Case For Impeachment

Tom breaks it down in plain in simple terms why Bush should e impeached.

How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power

Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power:

"How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power

Rumours of a link between the US first family and the Nazi war machine have circulated for decades. Now the Guardian can reveal how repercussions of events that culminated in action under the Trading with the Enemy Act are still being felt by today's president"

Thursday, September 07, 2006

RTE News - Al-Jazeera airs bin Laden tape

RTE News - Al-Jazeera airs bin Laden tape: "The Arab TV station, Al-Jazeera, has aired a videotape that shows al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden meeting what the channel said were the perpetrators of the 11 September attacks."

The broadcast comes just days before the fifth anniversary of the strikes but more importantly the day after we are told of the secret CIA prisons which now house al-Qaeda operatives and the mastermind behind 9/11. Isn't it funny how this story backs up the Bush lie that we need to prosecute the 911 plotters.

Bush admits CIA secret prisons

Bush admits CIA secret prisons

WASHINGTON - President Bush on Wednesday acknowledged for the first time that the CIA runs secret prisons overseas and said tough interrogation forced terrorist leaders to reveal plots to attack the United States and its allies.

Bush said 14 suspects - including the mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks and architects of the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole and the U.S. Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania - had been turned over to the Defense Department and moved to the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, for trial.

"This program has been, and remains, one of the most vital tools in our war against the terrorists," Bush said.

"Were it not for this program, our intelligence community believes that al-Qaida and its allies would have succeeded in launching another attack against the American homeland."

It's a disgrace to the Presidency and a slap in the face to Congress the way the Bush Regime has played this as being hard on terror when the real terro is what they are doingto our country. Bush would have us think that in order to have a fair trial of these people we will need a secret "military tribunal" that is not fully bound by the Geneva Conventions and which offers fewer rights to those captured in times of war.

"He finally acknowledged the elephant in the room that everybody had always been talking about," said Jumana Musa, advocacy director for Amnesty International USA.

"I think what surprised me is he seemed to be asking Congress to legalize it through statutes, essentially allowing him to continue to detain people in secret by sort of putting forth all this information that they got from these folks and somehow using that to justify what has been recognized by U.N. committees as an unlawful act and contrary to our treaty obligations."

Bush has thrown this on Congress to act to cover up his regime. I think we should impeach George Bush now!